How accurate is this traffic estimate?
It uses a no-cost CTR model to approximate visits by position, so it is best used for planning scenarios rather than exact reporting.
Forecast traffic upside with a free CTR-curve model using search volume, current ranking, and target ranking.
If this tool isn’t working as expected, please take a screenshot of the error and report the problem here so we can investigate and improve it.
SEO decisions should be data-driven - specifically, understanding what traffic improvement a ranking gain actually delivers. Moving from position 10 to position 3 for a keyword with 1,000 monthly searches moves the estimate from about 22 visits to about 110 visits a month, using this tool's own CTR assumptions.
This quantifies the gain so you can prioritize which ranking improvements to pursue - but it's a planning tool, not a forecast: real-world CTR is affected by featured snippets, ads, and AI Overviews, all of which can pull clicks below these baseline numbers.
This tool estimates organic traffic at different ranking positions using a fixed set of click-through-rate (CTR) assumptions built into the tool - not a live keyword database or search-console integration. You supply the monthly search volume and current/target positions; the tool multiplies volume by the assumed CTR for each position to estimate visits. Real CTR varies by query, device, and what else is on the results page (featured snippets, ads, and AI Overviews all reduce clicks below these baseline assumptions), so treat the output as a planning estimate, not a guarantee.
Add the ranking keyword and current position.
Provide the average monthly searches for the keyword.
Choose the position you want to reach and compare the scenario.
See projected visits and opportunity by improving rank.
Type the keyword and its average monthly search volume - a number you'll need to source yourself, since this tool doesn't look it up.
Enter where you currently rank and the position you're aiming for (1-50).
See Current Visits, Projected Visits, Monthly Lift, and the CTR shift between your two positions.
Compare estimated monthly visits at positions 1, 3, 5, and 10 for the same search volume, to see the shape of the full curve.
Best For
Input
Monthly Volume 1,000, Current Position 10, Target Position 3Result
Current Visits 22, Projected Visits 110, Monthly Lift 88, CTR Shift 2.2% → 11.0%Visits are simply volume × the assumed CTR for each position, rounded - both CTR values come from this tool's fixed table, not live data.
Input
Monthly Volume 5,000, Current Position 12, Target Position 5Result
Current Visits 98, Projected Visits 315, Monthly Lift 217, CTR Shift 1.96% → 6.3%Position 12 falls outside the table's explicit 1-10 values, so it uses the tool's decay formula for positions 11-20 instead.
Compare current and target positions for a keyword to estimate the monthly visit gain.
Run several keywords through the tool to compare which ranking gains would deliver the most estimated traffic.
Use the estimated lift as a starting figure for a stakeholder conversation, clearly labeled as a planning estimate.
Problem
Solution
This is a planning estimate based on fixed CTR assumptions - actual traffic depends on real search behavior, which this tool doesn't measure.
Problem
Solution
The percentages are this tool's own fixed table, not sourced from a specific published dataset - they're disclosed above so you can judge them yourself.
Problem
Solution
These SERP features can significantly reduce the organic clicks a position actually receives - the tool's curve doesn't adjust for them.
Problem
Solution
The estimate is only as good as the volume you enter - get a real number from Google Keyword Planner or Search Console rather than guessing.
Problem
Solution
Branded searches (people searching your brand name directly) tend to have much higher CTR at any position than this general curve assumes.
Use Google Keyword Planner (free) or Google Search Console's own impression data before running the estimate here.
Given real-world CTR variation from SERP features, treat the projected number as roughly what's achievable, not a precise target.
Use the Traffic Table (positions 1, 3, 5, 10) to see the shape of the curve and where the biggest jumps in estimated traffic happen.
If the keyword's results page has a featured snippet, ads, or an AI Overview, expect real clicks to run below this tool's baseline curve.
Search volume and positions are entered by you - the tool never looks up real search volume or your actual ranking anywhere.
The tool uses one hardcoded CTR-by-position table for every query - it doesn't vary by industry, device, or query type, and isn't attributed to a specific external study.
Featured snippets, ads, and AI Overviews all reduce real organic CTR below this tool's baseline curve, and the tool doesn't account for any of them.
Branded searches typically get much higher CTR than this general curve assumes at any position - the tool doesn't distinguish branded from non-branded queries.
There's no batch or multi-keyword mode - each estimate covers one keyword and one position scenario.
Each estimate is a one-time calculation - previous scenarios aren't saved between visits.
Both describe how clicks vary by position, but only one is based on live, ongoing data collection.
| This Tool | A Published CTR Study (e.g., Advanced Web Ranking, Backlinko) | |
|---|---|---|
| Data basis | A fixed table built into the tool, not tied to a specific external dataset | Aggregated real click data across many queries, periodically updated |
| Customization | You supply your own volume and positions; the CTR curve itself is fixed | Often segmented by device, industry, or query type |
| Best for | A quick, consistent planning estimate for one scenario at a time | Understanding broader CTR trends and methodology |
Which should you use?
Use this tool for a fast, consistent estimate once you already have a real search volume number - check a published CTR study if you want to understand how the underlying click-share assumptions were derived.
The most common question is which CTR curve this tool uses. It's a fixed table built into the tool: 27.6% at position 1, 15.8% at position 2, 11.0% at position 3, declining to 2.2% at position 10, and lower still for positions 11-50. These aren't pulled from a live study or dataset - they're the tool's own fixed assumptions, published here rather than left undisclosed. The FAQ below covers what can make your real CTR differ.
It uses a no-cost CTR model to approximate visits by position, so it is best used for planning scenarios rather than exact reporting.
Yes. Set your current and target positions to see the projected traffic lift for that ranking move.
Share them with stakeholders to justify optimization or content refresh sprints.
Leave your email so we can prioritize similar tools and updates.
Trending tools will appear as visitors explore the catalog.
Your recently visited tools will show up here.